The performance psychology industry sells one story: that the difference between people who excel and people who stagnate is mental.
Dr.
Valiante's clients are not representative of humanity. They are people who can afford premium coaching, have the cognitive bandwidth to implement it. Operate in environments where marginal improvements compound into visible success.
This is the distinction the field refuses to name. Bourdieu spent decades documenting how cultural capital concentrates among people who already possess it. How taste becomes a marker of class, and class becomes invisible because it looks like taste. Performance psychology has inherited the same sleight of hand.
The question worth asking is not whether Valiante's methods work. The question is whether his success reflects genuinely novel understanding of human psychology or simply documents what happens when wealthy, motivated people receive expensive attention.