Fikret Aras opened a blank document and typed the heading: Five-Year Plan. He listed the role he wanted, the salary band, the industry. He researched the required credentials and noted the typical promotion timeline. He identified three companies and ranked them. He closed the document, saved it as Final, and felt, briefly, that he had done something. He had not started anything.
A plan is a story about a future self you haven't met yet, and it tends to flatter them. The problem is not ambition or even the document itself. The problem is sequence: planning asks you to commit before you have any feel for the work, the attention it demands, whether you find it genuinely absorbing or merely respectable. Enjoyment โ the active, effortful kind that produces flow โ cannot be deduced from a job description. It has to be encountered. Small experiments run before commitment give you something a plan never can: evidence about your own experience inside the work.
Stewart Butterfield co-founded two companies that failed at their original purpose before becoming something else entirely. The game Glitch shut down in 2012; its internal messaging tool became Slack. That is a documented pivot, but the less-noted part is what it required: enough actual time inside the work to notice what was generating energy and what wasn't. The experiment produced the data. The plan, had there been a rigid one, would have protected the wrong thing.
You are on a call right now, or about to join one, about a direction you are considering. Notice where your attention goes during the conversation. If you are tracking every detail, asking follow-up questions before the other person finishes, losing the thread of the clock, that is information. If you are mentally drafting your grocery list while nodding, that is also information. The work is already telling you something, and no five-year document back on your desktop can override it. Fikret's plan had columns for salary and timeline. It had no column for this.
You will not find the right work by thinking harder about it. You will find it by doing small versions of it and paying attention to what happens to time.