The Daily Signal
Film

"It's fun to watch them steal"

Iris·Friday, October 30, 2026 Edition
Fashion theft as political argument

Boots Riley's Boosters is a film about shoplifting as Robin Hood drag on inequality, which is a genuinely interesting target — but the execution trades argument for momentum. By the third act you've stopped thinking about wealth and started simply enjoying the theft. Demi Moore plays a luxury-fashion executive. A gang of women systematically rob high-end stores, and the movie hurtles through this premise with the kind of escalating chaos that feels like it's saying something important if you don't look too closely at what.

The problem is not that Riley chose visual frenzy. It's that frenzy became his way of avoiding the actual claim. Hirokazu Koreeda's Shoplifters (2018) showed a family stealing groceries. The camera stayed with the specific textures of their need — the mathematics of what they could pocket, how much they dared take, what hunger actually looked like when you had to steal it. Every cut meant something. Every pause revealed the calculus underneath. Riley's camera moves faster than thought. Feels radical until you realize it's obscuring the very logic the satire supposedly depends on.

This is the trap that caught Heathers in 1989. The film moved so quickly through its own cruelty that audiences stopped parsing the critique and just felt the rush of transgression. Winona Ryder's character murders her classmates. The film is ostensibly satirizing high school brutality, but the editing and the score and the general kinetic pleasure made it feel like you were meant to enjoy watching her do it. By the time you could think critically about what you were watching, the moment had already accelerated past you.

Speed as a way of not looking

When satire accelerates past its own reasoning, you're left watching people break rules and feeling thrilled by the transgression alone. Moore's role. Positioned as the obstacle these women outmaneuver. Never lands as complicated enough to justify the visual treatment she gets. She's a type in motion, not a person whose presence might actually trouble the film's Robin Hood narrative. The fashion industry deserves scrutiny. So does retail economics, and so does the question of what theft reveals about inequality. But revelation requires stillness.

What this reveals about us is that we're hungry for a fantasy where the system gets disrupted without having to think about what disruption would actually cost. Boosters delivers that fantasy at such speed that you leave the theatre feeling like you watched something transgressive without the discomfort transgression usually requires. It's satisfying in exactly the way true satire isn't supposed to be.

Watch a still frame

Go back to Shoplifters and watch the supermarket scene where the family steals—notice what Koreeda's camera lingers on versus what Riley's cuts away from in Boosters.

Related Stories
Film
Camera Movement, Not Craftsmanship, Built Dread in Alien
Ridley Scott's Xenomorph seemed more terrifying not because practical effects are inherently superior, but because physical constraints forced slow camera movem…
Insight
"I'll just read it again"
Re-reading a page feels like learning because it feels familiar — but familiarity and memory are different things, and only one of them shows up when you need i…
Psychology
Muzafer Sherif's 1948 Boys Needed Crisis, Not Hate
Muzafer Sherif's 1948 Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that ordinary children could be engineered into hostile groups through situational design—but the exp…
More From Today's Edition
Food
Yelp's Fake Reviews Migrate Down, Not Out
Platforms can police fraud on their main sites, but sophisticated operators simply move to secondary venues with weaker moderation, leaving desperate businesses…
Technology
Recognize when constraint becomes strategy
Intel is selling out of cheap laptop chips and calling it market validation, but the pattern repeats: when manufacturing limits force the company into lower-mar…
View Past Editions >